Democrats Convicted of Voter Fraud!

Widespread voter fraud was being committed in East St. Louis, Missouri! You may not have heard about it because the voter fraud was committed Democrats! What's more is that the center of the voter fraud involved elected and appointed city officials and all who were charged were convicted on all counts they were charged with.

There's More! There were allegations of a prostitution ring being managed right out of the East St. Louis City Hall. Also there will be another case dealing with an attempted "murder of a government witness."

Gateway Pundit has posted an excellent account of the entire saga. For obvious reasons, don't expect for any investigations or calls of investigations or even protests to try to find how high up the Democrat National Comittee that voter fraud exists.

Mali D. Currington
mdcurrington@yahoo.com

Supreme Court Decision neuters Proposition 13

The "People's Initiative to Limit Property Taxation” more commonly called Prop 13, has been nearly been completely overturned due to last weeks U.S. Supreme Court Decision to reinterpret a portion of the 5th amendment for the benefit of government "financial interests". Because of this decision, all a government would have to do is use its eminent domain power to evict a homeowner and offer that property to a private interest that will pay a higher tax assessment.

Prop 13 limits the property tax assessment to 1% of its purchase price, forever, until the property is resold “voluntarily”. Anti-Prop 13 groups want to chang the law so that properties can be assessed at a higher amount in order to bring more tax revenues to the governemtn treasury. This decision empowers the governemnt to force the homeowner to sell the property (when the government wants the property sold) and entertain offers from new potenetial private owners who will purchase the property and pay a higher assessment tax to the government treasury.

Since the governemnt only has to declare that the public use is the increased tax revenue and not the actual public usage of the property bieng taken, they can legally sell that same house to a new buyer nd enjoy the increased flow of tax receipts from the new homeowners.

Anti-Prop 13 groups are going to realize this and suddenly there will be plans for mass population shifts of the less affluent around the state. Governments can plan for new residents in those old and stable houses that don’t flood or suffer earthquake damage. Governments can advertise their proposals to potenetal residenst who will pay the higher tax assessment in place of the increased commuter costs they have been paying since they moved to the suburbs.

Unfortunately the carnage does not end with the aformentioned. This decision has made government a Real Estate Broker and General Contractor. Once again since the public use is only increased tax revenues and the government is not restricted from selling that same house to a new potential homeowner, governents could also create their own listings and do their own remodeling. Before any reader dismisses this paragraph as pure speculation, first examine the level of involvement governments already have in the Real Estate Industry – Section 8 and HUD Housing.

Prop 13 Advocates had better be devising strategies to respond to this seismic shift in public policy!

Evidence of Racism by Homosexuals

You may never hear this story on your local news station, the mainstream media or place that did major stories on Matthew Shephard but you will read it as a post by fellow Blogger aCraig Deluz.

U.S. Supreme Court Decision Will Destroy Black Wealth

Last weeks U.S. Supreme Court Decision to reinterpret a portion of the 5th Amendment for the benefit of government "financial interests" is going to destroy black wealth disproportionately. Four White Left-Wing Liberal Democrats and one White "moderate" Republican formed the all white, 5 person majority of the 5-4 decision of the so-called "conservative" high court to guarantee the opportunity of [mostly white] developers to collude with the government to force Blacks to sell their homes. Governments are now empowered to do redistribute accumulating wealth from hardworking Blacks to their White, Left-Wing liberal elite, benefactors.

The amount of accumulating wealth and income that Blacks would lose is extremely disproportionate and staggering because according to the 2000 U.S. Census, over 75% of Blacks live in urban areas while only about 33% of Whites live in urban areas. Also the most sought-after property for redevelopment over the last 15 years has been in these urban areas. Now remember, generally the largest asset that Blacks owned is their home. Developers have been reluctant to plan development in urban areas because the private cost of that land can be expensive and the time involved to secure it can be consuming. Governments have wanted to help developers in the past but have been limited to a strict interpretation of "public interest" (i.e. roads, bridges, stadiums, etc.) and were not been able to force private property owners to sell for the benefit of other private owners - not matter how much these governments wanted to do so.

Furthermore, Blacks would have to pay an increased assessment tax on the new home that they would have to buy which would neutralize President Bush's tax reform measures. If that home was part of their retirement plan, the forced sell would result in a reduction of anticipated (retiree controlled) retirement benefits that could be realized. This would neutralize President Bush's reform of Social Security. So it is a lose situation for the Black homeowners and a win for the government and private developers.

Readers please understand that the impact of this decision is as profound as the Plessy v. Ferguson decision in 1896 to establish the doctrine of "separate but equal". We cannot wait another 58 years for another Supreme Court to overturn this decision (as was done in Plessy with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954) nor should we wait 68 years for a "Property Rights Act" to be passed in order to further clarify and enforce another Constitutional Amendment (as was done with the 1964 Civil Rights Act). Conservatives have to be as outraged as those who organized to abolish slavery in the 1800's and as determined as those who managed the passage of our nation's Civil Rights Legislation in the 1900's. Left-Wing Liberal Judicial interference of Black humanity and prosperity must end now!